Shockwaves and Blockchains: How Modern Wars Test the Crypto Market

From Russia and Ukraine to Afghanistan and the Middle East, every modern war tests crypto’s true role: safe haven, risk asset, or last-resort lifeline in a world on edge.

On this page

“$340 million liquidated in under 60 minutes.” The message flashes across trading terminals as Bitcoin slips 2% in the predawn hours, the world still reeling from news of Israel’s overnight strike on Iranian military sites. 

In crypto Telegram channels, traders scramble for updates:

Safe haven my ass, everything is red!

writes one.

Gold spikes, oil surges, and crypto – true to form – dives with the rest of risk assets. For a brief moment, it’s not about charts or halving cycles, but about war: the old world crashing into the digital one. Once again, conflict triggers chaos, and the crypto market is the global nerve ending that twitches first.

Why is Bitcoin called “digital gold”? Explore the traits that earn it this title and how it stacks up against the real thing in our education piece!

Why Wars Move the Crypto Market

For all its cypherpunk roots and utopian rhetoric, crypto is, at its core, a barometer for global fear. Every war – every sudden shock to the old financial order – sends ripples through digital markets. When missiles fly and sanctions bite, the question isn’t “How much is Bitcoin worth,” but “Can I still move money if everything else is locked down?” From day one, cryptocurrency has offered a Plan B: a way to escape frozen bank accounts, dodge collapsing currencies, or simply hedge against the unknown.

That’s why every major military crisis becomes a live-fire stress test for the crypto ecosystem. Panic can mean capital flight, the search for a new safe haven, or the desperate need to bypass broken systems. Each time, blockchain promises speed, censorship-resistance, and global liquidity – while the world holds its breath and waits to see if that promise is real, or just another story we tell ourselves in the dark.

Line chart showing Bitcoin’s price plunging to $103,732 after the Israel - Iran escalation on June 13, 2025, before gradually recovering. The Coinomist
Bitcoin’s sharp drop in the early hours of June 13, 2025, after Israel’s strike on Iran, followed by a rapid recovery as markets digested the news. Source: CoinMarketCap

How Crypto Reacts to War: Five Case Studies

Before we dive into the details, here’s a rapid-fire look at how the crypto market has responded to the most significant wars and military crises since its inception. The following cases show the range of reactions – from fleeting panic to dramatic transformation – that conflict can spark in digital assets.

Headline Moments: When War Redefined Crypto

Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine (2022–present)

Within hours of Russia’s full-scale invasion, Bitcoin plunged 8%. Just as quickly, the market rebounded – BTC rallied 12% from its low in four days.

It wasn’t just a trading bounce:

  1. Ukrainians and Russians alike turned to crypto to move money, bypass capital controls, and crowdfund war efforts
  2. Stablecoins like USDT became “digital dollars” in a region where the ruble and hryvnia were battered or tightly restricted
  3. Crypto became a lifeline: mass flows, legal reforms, and donations on an unprecedented scale

The war rewired global perceptions: crypto wasn’t just a speculative toy, but a tool of survival and sovereignty in a world of frozen bank accounts and sanctions.

Afghanistan: The Taliban Takeover (2021)

Globally, the crypto market barely blinked when Kabul fell. Locally, it was a different story:

  1. As banks closed and cash evaporated, desperate Afghans flocked to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins as their only remaining exit from hyperinflation
  2. Usage soared – up to $150 million a month entered Afghanistan via crypto at its peak – until the new regime banned all trading, erasing 99% of volume overnight
  3. For a brief window, crypto was the financial lifeline for NGOs, women’s groups, and ordinary people

This case showed both the promise and hard limits of digital assets in a true economic freefall.

Arthur Hayes sounds the alarm on stablecoin IPO hype — find out why he’s predicting overvaluation and crashes ahead in our news coverage!

Other Flashpoints: The Background Noise of Conflict

Israel–Hamas War (2023)

Bitcoin dipped 3% in the immediate aftermath, but rebounded as quickly as it fell, driven mostly by unrelated ETF optimism. Investors sought safety in gold and dollars, not crypto. The real story was regulatory: Israeli authorities and global exchanges froze wallets linked to Hamas and cracked down on illicit flows. Crypto played a role in the drama, but as an object of compliance, not a global safe haven.

Syrian Civil War (2013 escalation)

The idea of Bitcoin as a “safe haven” first flickered here, but the effect was mostly narrative, not market-moving. There was no major rush into crypto, and global volumes stayed modest. Syria’s war was the start of the myth; the rest of the decade would test it.

Israel–Iran (2025)

This conflict is still unfolding, and the full market impact remains to be seen. For now, the crypto market’s immediate reaction looked like this:

  • Bitcoin dropped 2–3% on news of Israeli strikes
  • $340 million in crypto liquidations in a single hour
  • Investors stampeded into gold and oil, while crypto mirrored the global risk-off sentiment

Once again, the “digital gold” narrative faced a reality check: in moments of acute crisis, crypto moved with stocks, not against them. The situation continues to develop.

Bitcoin’s Drop, Recovery, and Role in Global Conflicts*

ConflictBTC DropRecovery TimeShort Market Dynamic
Russia–Ukraine–8%2–3 daysV-shaped bounce, then growth
Israel–Hamas–3%2–4 daysVolatility, then rebound
Israel–Iran–2–3%(awaiting data)Correction so far
Afghanistan~0% (global)Inside country: surge in adoption, then collapse
SyriaInsignificantNarrative only, no real market impact
*Source: Data compiled by The Coinomist from on-chain analytics and internal market briefings.

Panic, Recovery, and When Crypto Becomes a Lifeline

Across every war and crisis, the first move is always the same: a sharp “risk-off” drop as traders flee to traditional safe havens – gold, oil, U.S. treasuries. Crypto, for all its mythology as “digital gold,” tends to sell off in sync with stocks, not against them. The numbers tell the story: whether it’s Kyiv, Gaza, or Tehran, Bitcoin typically drops 2–8% in the first hours, but rarely collapses – panic is contained, and mass liquidations are limited by today’s market structure.

Yet, beneath the surface, the differences are profound. In most cases, the “safe haven” narrative remains just that – a narrative. Global flows snap back quickly; crypto recovers with equities. But in true financial meltdowns – like Russia under sanctions, or Afghanistan’s banking collapse – crypto shifts from being a risk asset to, at times, a real lifeline. Crypto adoption often accelerates during crises, but does not fully replace the failing traditional system. It’s only in these outlier cases that digital assets become more than a trade: they become the last passport, the only bank, the tool of survival.

Sticker with the word “Cryptos” inside a red heart, symbolizing hope and belief in crypto’s role during times of turmoil. The Coinomist
In every crisis, the idea of “crypto as a safe haven” is put to the test – sometimes it’s just a story, sometimes it’s a lifeline. Source: Unsplash

War, Myth, and the Real Safe Havens

War reveals the truth behind the narrative. In every crisis, crypto dreams of being “new form of gold,” but reality checks come fast: the market sells off, liquidations spike, and the promise of a defensive asset gives way to raw volatility. Yet the story doesn’t end there. When the traditional financial world falters – when banks freeze, currencies collapse, or sanctions bite – crypto sometimes steps up as the last line of defense. For most, it’s just another risk asset. For the few in desperate straits, it’s the difference between having a lifeline or being cut off from the world.

Each new conflict reminds us: speed matters, access matters, and stories about true hedge are always written in real time, not in theory. The crypto market is where panic and hope collide. In the end, survival – whether of money, people, or a system – depends not on narratives, but on how quickly you can adapt when the world turns upside down.

Strategy scoops up 10,100 BTC during geopolitical unrest — get the details on Saylor’s $1.05B Bitcoin bet amid Israel-Iran tensions in our news coverage!

The content on The Coinomist is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial advice. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any content. Neither we accept liability for any errors or omissions in the information provided or for any financial losses incurred as a result of relying on this information. Actions based on this content are at your own risk. Always do your own research and consult a professional. See our Terms, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers for more details.

Articles by this author
Why Restaking Could Be the Spark That Triggers the Next Big DeFi Collapse

Why Restaking Could Be the Spark That Triggers the Next Big DeFi Collapse

Restaking increases returns on staked ETH. But behind the apparent simplicity are complex risks, where the failure of a single node could have a catastrophic impact across the ecosystem.

Internet Capital Markets Explained: The Future of Global Financial Systems

Internet Capital Markets Explained: The Future of Global Financial Systems

Think beyond DeFi. Internet Capital Markets strive to reconstruct financial infrastructure into an open, code-powered, global framework. We explore how it functions, who’s driving it, and why it’s no longer theoretical.