Arbitrum Collects $2M Through New Timeboost Transaction System

Timeboost auction model brings $2 million to Arbitrum DAO treasury in 11 weeks, with projections of $10M annual revenue potential.

Arbitrum's Timeboost transaction ordering system generated over $2 million in fees during its first 11 weeks of operation on Arbitrum One and Nova, according to on-chain data from Dune Analytics. A dashboard tracks live auction bids, winner payouts, and revenue in real time. 

The Timeboost feature launched in mid-April 2025. The new system replaced Arbitrum's previous first-come, first-served transaction processing with an auction-based model. Users now bid for priority placement of their transactions in blocks.

Timeboost operates as a second-price auction. The highest bidder wins priority access to blockspace but pays the second-highest bid amount rather than their own bid. The previous system allowed MEV searchers to submit zero-cost bids that often caused network congestion.

Current fee collection rates suggest Timeboost could generate approximately $10 million annually for the Arbitrum DAO treasury. However, the Arbitrum Foundation previously projected annual fees between $19 million and $95 million once the system reaches full adoption.

Before Timeboost, Arbitrum One processed transactions based solely on arrival time. MEV bots frequently exploited this system through front-running strategies. The new auction model requires actual payment for priority access rather than allowing free attempts at priority placement.

Read on: Ethereum Layer 2 Solutions: Who’s Winning the Race for Mass Adoption in 2025?

The fees flow directly to the Arbitrum DAO, which governs the network through token holder voting. Timeboost represents Arbitrum's transition from time-based transaction ordering to market-based prioritization.

Analytics show consistent daily fee collection since the April launch, with higher activity periods generating increased auction competition and revenue. The system processes both regular transactions and MEV-related activity through the same auction mechanism.

The content on The Coinomist is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial advice. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any content. Neither we accept liability for any errors or omissions in the information provided or for any financial losses incurred as a result of relying on this information. Actions based on this content are at your own risk. Always do your own research and consult a professional. See our Terms, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers for more details.

Articles by this author
Why Restaking Could Be the Spark That Triggers the Next Big DeFi Collapse

Why Restaking Could Be the Spark That Triggers the Next Big DeFi Collapse

Restaking increases returns on staked ETH. But behind the apparent simplicity are complex risks, where the failure of a single node could have a catastrophic impact across the ecosystem.

Internet Capital Markets Explained: The Future of Global Financial Systems

Internet Capital Markets Explained: The Future of Global Financial Systems

Think beyond DeFi. Internet Capital Markets strive to reconstruct financial infrastructure into an open, code-powered, global framework. We explore how it functions, who’s driving it, and why it’s no longer theoretical.