Proposed Ethereum Upgrade: Speed Gains at Validators’ Expense?
Ben Adams, co-founder of Illyriad Games, proposed an initiative to speed up the Ethereum blockchain. His proposal, submitted as Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) #8931, recommends reducing Ethereum’s slot time* from 12 seconds to 8 seconds.
On this page
Ben Adams, co-founder of Illyriad Games, proposed an initiative to speed up the Ethereum blockchain. His proposal, submitted as Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) #8931, recommends reducing Ethereum's slot time* from 12 seconds to 8 seconds.
*A slot time is the period needed to verify and add a new block in a decentralized network. Reducing the slot time increases the network's capacity to process more transactions per second.
Benefits of the Proposal:
- Reducing the slot time by 4 seconds would increase Ethereum's transaction throughput by 33%, which is a significant improvement.
- Rollup scaling solutions for Ethereum would see increased efficiency and speed.
- Shorter slot times would also help balance the load during peak network periods, such as during airdrops.
Related: Explaining Complex EIPs in Simple Terms
Challenges of Adams' EIP
Any major change to a complex system like Ethereum can have both positive and negative impacts.
One of the critical concerns highlighted by commentators is the increased complexity of validation.
More blocks being generated means a higher load on the network, demanding greater computational resources from validators. If validators cannot quickly adapt to these hardware requirements, it could destabilize the network and increase the risk of errors.
What's Next?
Discussions around Adams' proposal reveal concerns about additional investments needed for validator infrastructure and the potential rise in gas fees. The final decision by the Ethereum community will depend on these discussions, and we should have more clarity soon.
Read more: Minimizing Gas Fees in High Traffic Conditions
The content on The Coinomist is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial advice. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any content. Neither we accept liability for any errors or omissions in the information provided or for any financial losses incurred as a result of relying on this information. Actions based on this content are at your own risk. Always do your own research and consult a professional. See our Terms, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers for more details.