Bitcoin is more ecofriendly than metallurgical production
Daniel Batten, a well-known environmental researcher and investor, proved that Bitcoin mining leverages 52.6% sustainable energy sources (solar, wind, hydropower, etc.), not 37.6%, as claimed by Cambridge scientists.
On this page
How did such a disparity in numbers emerge? As a matter of fact, traditional studies ignore:
- cloud mining;
- flare-gas mining;
- off-grid mining;
- shift of miners to less expensive renewable energy sources.
This leads Batten to the conclusion that there are no barriers to the institutional adoption of cryptocurrencies.
Checkmate, global warming witnesses!
The content on The Coinomist is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial advice. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any content. Neither we accept liability for any errors or omissions in the information provided or for any financial losses incurred as a result of relying on this information. Actions based on this content are at your own risk. Always do your own research and consult a professional. See our Terms, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers for more details.